Planning Guides
Strategic decarbonization planning (SDP) is a comprehensive approach to retrofitting buildings that aligns decarbonization activities with typical real estate cycles to cost-effectively achieve deep reductions in emissions. By integrating technical solutions with real estate capital plans, project teams can develop holistic, optimized decarbonization roadmaps for their buildings that prioritize flexibility, reduce risk, and unlock long-term value.
This guide distills proven practices from NYSERDA’s Empire Building Challenge and the Guide to Strategic Decarbonization Planning, a resource developed collaboratively by ASHRAE, U.S. Green Building Council, and NYSERDA. It offers a flexible set of strategies that can be tailored to your building, team, and timeline—whether the work is led internally or supported by consultants.
The best practices detailed in this guide illustrate that through careful planning, smart phasing, and strategically timed investments, common roadblocks to decarbonization can be overcome to yield meaningful emissions reductions and increased asset value.
Design Resource Efficient Solutions
Deep decarbonization isn’t just about swapping systems—it’s about rethinking them. Feasible solutions for large buildings often require a whole-system approach, best achieved through integrative design.
To make integrative design more actionable, this guide distills best practices from real-world decarbonization projects. A consistent takeaway: controlling heating system capacity is essential to managing costs tied to demand charges, equipment sizing, and electrical service requirements.
Together, the approaches below help optimize existing systems to avoid overbuilt infrastructure, reducing the overall cost and complexity of retrofits, and enabling future-proofing of buildings.
Reduce Energy Load
Reducing energy loads as much as possible early on positions the entire decarbonization plan for success. It enables system right-sizing and unlocks a range of co-benefits: envelope upgrades and other load reduction strategies can enhance resilience, improve occupant comfort, and increase asset value, all while lowering long-term operating costs.
Many of these strategies are passive, durable, and low-risk—making them a solid foundation for long-term performance. Common approaches include improving the building envelope, managing air infiltration, enhancing controls, tightening operations and maintenance, and upgrading to efficient equipment.
In planning, be sure to account not only for the direct energy savings from load reduction measures, but also for their impact on HVAC system capacity. Smaller loads may enable downsizing of major equipment, allowing for reduced first cost, electrical infrastructure needs, and long-term demand charges. Where possible, quantify co-benefits such as improved comfort or resilience as these may strengthen the business case or support access to funding.
Helpful Resources
Recover Wasted Heat
Waste heat isn’t waste—it’s an opportunity. Capturing energy that would otherwise be rejected from the building can reduce emissions and significantly improve project economics.
Integrating heat recovery strategies early in the planning process boosts overall system efficiency and allows for smaller, lower-cost equipment. Common approaches include tempering ventilation air, transferring heat between building zones, and raising source temperatures to improve heat pump performance.
Maximizing the value of existing heat is a smart first step—before investing in additional capacity.
Helpful Resources
Reconfigure Systems
System reconfiguration is often a critical enabler of deep decarbonization. Upgrading water or air distribution systems can unlock major gains in efficiency and flexibility—while setting the stage for full electrification.
For example, transitioning to a modern low-temperature hot water system can future-proof a building by enabling energy recovery, thermal storage, and compatibility with a broader range of heat pump technologies.
These upgrades may not be flashy, but they’re foundational—especially in older buildings, where outdated distribution infrastructure can severely constrain decarbonization pathways.
Helpful Resources
Replace Fossil Fuel-Burning Heating
Most of the best practices in this guide point to one essential step: replacing fossil fuel–burning equipment. This is critical to eliminating emissions and achieving long-term decarbonization goals. The most common path is electrifying space and water heating, typically with heat pumps.
Unlike combustion systems, heat pumps move heat rather than generate it—making them several times more efficient than fossil fuel alternatives. This efficiency helps offset higher electricity prices, often resulting in lower operating costs even when utility rates are less favorable.
Heat pumps come in a range of configurations suitable for large buildings, including centralized systems distributing hot water or steam, ambient loop systems connected to decentralized heat pumps, and packaged units installed throughout the building.
Each approach carries tradeoffs in efficiency, capital cost, control, and long-term flexibility. For example, ambient or low-temperature distribution systems may require higher upfront investment but can unlock long-term benefits—such as improved efficiency, thermal storage integration, and expanded heat recovery opportunities.
Helpful Resources
Manage Peak Demand
Electrifying heating systems can increase peak electric demand, but it doesn’t have to. With smart design, some projects have kept peak demand flat, or even reduced it, compared to fossil fuel baselines.
Avoiding costly demand charges and maintaining grid-aligned performance depends not just on how much energy systems use, but when they use it. Managing equipment capacity and runtime is critical.
Key strategies include: load reduction, on-site renewables, load shaving (reducing brief demand spikes), or load shifting (moving loads to off-peak hours).
These strategies should be reflected in both the decarbonization roadmap and the day-to-day operation of systems. Just as important: ensure electric demand charges are included in the financial analysis. Excluding them can result in inaccurate projections of operating costs, which can result in selecting the wrong investment pathway.
Helpful Resources
Right-Size Equipment and Partial Electrification
Most existing heating systems are significantly oversized. This can be a major liability for electric systems—driving up capital costs, demand charges, and electrical infrastructure needs.
Right-sizing is challenging in practice. Standard engineering procedures tend to favor conservative sizing, and contractual structures often disincentivize downsizing. Retrofits offer an advantage: real buildings generate real data. Measuring delivered heating output during peak conditions provides a more accurate basis for sizing than static design assumptions. Short-term monitoring can help avoid overbuilding while maintaining confidence in system performance.
When full electrification isn’t feasible, partial electrification is a practical bridge. Size electric systems to cover typical loads, and retain a smaller fossil system for rare peaks. This adds redundancy, reduces infrastructure costs, and supports phased transitions to full electrification.
Convene a Design Charrette
A charrette is a focused, collaborative workshop that brings together key stakeholders—owners, consultants, contractors, tenants—to surface challenges early, align on strategy, and build consensus. In the context of decarbonization planning, charrettes are a powerful tool for stress testing preliminary retrofit plans, allowing for creative problem-solving that can enhance the retrofit design.
Helpful Resources
