Case Study

215 East 68th Street

Electric heat recovery chiller implementation at Upper East Side high-rise

This case study was chosen as part of the Empire Building Challenge competition. Click here to learn more about the Empire Building Challenge competition.

215 East 68th Street is an approximately 1M+ square foot multifamily building in the Upper East Side of Manhattan. Built in 1962 and spanning 32 floors, the building supports tenant heating, cooling, and domestic hot water needs through natural gas boilers and absorption chillers. As a result, the building burns fossil fuels for the entire year, putting the building in Local Law 97 penalty range starting in 2030. Rudin Management plans to retrofit the outdated system with new electric heat recovery chillers to offset natural gas usage and align with New York City’s electrification efforts. The new system eliminates the need for fossil fuel boilers to create cooling and domestic hot water in the summer. The building also intends to install “geo-ready” thermal taps to prepare for a potential future ground loop under the existing parking lot and heat recovery from the 24/7 building exhaust system. The project largely decarbonizes building operations and aligns the building with company-wide sustainability goals.

215 East 68th Street, Manhattan NY 10065
Lessons Learned

Heat pump technology is rapidly developing, creating cost-effective opportunities to decarbonize and electrify buildings without sacrificing operating costs.

Emissions Reductions

 The proposed retrofit avoids penalties associated with Local Law 97 entirely, while also significantly reducing building energy use intensity.

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
  • Equipment nearing end-of-life
  • Efficiency improvements
Asset Conditions
  • Capital event cycles
  • Carbon emissions limits
Market Conditions
  • Technology improves
  • Policy changes
  • Infrastructure transitions
  • Fuels phase out

The last major cooling plant upgrade at 215 East 68th Street was in 2001 when three, low pressure steam absorption chillers were installed. Since then, NYC introduced new carbon emission limits as part of LL97. The new laws push for the electrification of buildings to mitigate significant financial penalties associated with burning fossil fuels. In the case of 215 East 68th Street, building ownership is facing annual penalties exceeding $250,000 per year starting in 2030. As a result, Rudin sees an opportunity to replace the fossil-fuel cooling plant with an electric plant that generates domestic hot water and recovers building waste heat. The new system eliminates the 2030 penalty entirely and significantly reduces the building energy use intensity (EUI).

Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

Existing Conditions

This diagram illustrates the building prior to the initiation of Strategic Decarbonization planning by the owners and their teams.

Click through the measures under “Building After” to understand the components of the building’s energy transition.

Sequence of Measures

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

Building System Affected

  • heating
  • cooling
  • ventilation
215 East 68th Street before
215 East 68th Street after
Heat Recovery Chillers
Under Consideration: "Geo-Ready" Hydronic Connection
Under Consideration: Condensing Boilers
Exhaust Ventilation Heat recovery
Under Consideration: Upgrade Air Handling Units (AHU)
Under Consideration: Air Source Heat Pump Boilers
Under Consideration: Exhaust Fan Heat Recovery Units (HRU)
Under Consideration: Tie in Commercial Tenant's Condenser Water

Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

Retrofit Costs

Decarbonization Costs

$16M

Cost of ECM #1: 1.2M.

Cost of ECM #2: 14M.

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Costs

$4.4M

Energy cost savings: 477k.

Repairs and maintenance savings: -150k.

BAU  cost of system replacement/upgrades: 4.1M.

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Risks

$2.7M

Local Law 97 or other regulatory fines:

2030-2034: 294k.

2035-2039: 483k.

2040-2049: 668k.

2050+: 1.2M.

 

Added Value

Decarbonization Value

$3M

Incentives: 3M.

Net Present Value

$3.7M

The central cooling plant at 215 East 68th Street is nearing the end of its useful life, prompting Rudin Management to consider the best plan for the buildings plant. The cheapest and simplest approach would be to replace existing low pressure steam absorbers in kind. Weighing the LL97 penalties starting in 2030, the building saw an opportunity to implement a new and electric heat recovery system to eliminate fines and decarbonize the building’s operations. While the electric heat recovery chillers carry a larger upfront cost, the cost of ownership over 30 years is lower than that of a fossil fuel system with a lower upfront cost but significant annual emissions penalties.

An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

Strategic Decarbonization Roadmap

More Like This

Case Study
NYSERDA supported
Case Study

The Victory

Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

The Victory Case Study
Case Study
Case Study

The Towers

Oldest US multifamily co-op transforms wastewater into clean energy
The Towers Case Study