Case Study

PENN 1

Innovative heat recovery project for carbon emissions reduction

Vornado Realty Trust is spearheading a groundbreaking retrofit at 1 Pennsylvania Plaza (PENN 1) in New York City, aiming to reach 100% carbon neutrality by 2040. This ambitious project is part of the company’s broader commitment to environmental sustainability, as outlined in their Vision 2030. PENN 1, a towering landmark in midtown Manhattan, stands at 57 stories and spans approximately 2.5 million square feet of office and retail space. Constructed in 1972, the building is a key component of THE PENN DISTRICT, Vornado’s flagship property cluster.

The roadmap to carbon neutrality at PENN 1 includes advanced waterside heat recovery measures. This strategy focuses on capturing and reusing heat from the building’s condenser water loop, a method that not only reduces heating loads but also facilitates a subsequent transition to electrification through air-source heat pumps and thermal storage. The PENN 1 project demonstrates a ‘thermal dispatch model,’ in which carbon-free energy sources are gradually deployed to fulfill the heating and cooling demands of a large commercial building.

By adopting this innovative approach, Vornado aims to significantly reduce the carbon footprint of PENN 1 while also setting a replicable model for building decarbonization in New York City. This initiative underscores Vornado’s role as a leader in sustainable real estate development, with a portfolio that includes over 34 million square feet of premier assets across New York City, Chicago, and San Francisco. Through Vision 2030, Vornado’s commitment to achieving carbon neutrality and a 50% site energy reduction reflects their dedication to pioneering sustainable solutions in the urban landscape.

PENN 1+2 Hero building

Project Status

Planning

Under Construction

Monitoring & Evaluation

Emissions Reduction

100%

PENN 1 aims to achieve 100% carbon neutrality by 2030.

Lessons Learned

Accurate, calibrated energy models are essential for realistic projections of energy and carbon reductions, guiding the selection of feasible decarbonization measures for complex buildings.

Lessons Learned

Leveraging existing technologies in innovative ways, such as the purposeful dispatch of thermal energy and optimizing for scalability and affordability, can be as impactful as waiting for new technological breakthroughs.

Lessons Learned

Training and involving operations teams in the design and implementation phases are crucial for ensuring systems function as intended.

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
  • Equipment nearing end-of-life
  • New heat source potential
  • Tenant load change
  • Resilience upgrades
  • Efficiency improvements
Asset Conditions
  • Repositioning
  • Capital event cycles
  • Carbon emissions limits
  • Tenant sustainability demands
  • Investor sustainability demands
Market Conditions
  • Technology improves
  • Policy changes
  • Utility prices change
  • Fuels phase out
Learn More

The project team initially explored two packages of combined reduction measures to assess the impact of eliminating fossil fuels and electrifying the building’s heating end uses. Individual measures studied earlier in the project were selected and combined with additional infrastructure enhancements to develop two electrification packages summarized as follows: 

  • Beneficial Electrification: Incorporates a suite of tenant, airside, and envelope upgrades along with the installation of air source heat pumps working in conjunction with the cogeneration plant to keep the building heated; eliminates all district steam resources. 
  • Full Electrification: Incorporates the same set of upgrades but utilizes more air source heat pumps in place of the cogeneration plant. 

The thermal dispatch approach utilized at PENN 1 allows the building to intelligently prioritize low-carbon thermal resources for operational building needs ahead of those that are more carbon intensive. This strategy, enabled by electrification of heating loads and heat recovery measures, will reduce energy use by 22% and carbon emissions by 38% by 2030.

Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

Existing Conditions

This diagram illustrates the building prior to the initiation of Strategic Decarbonization planning by the owners and their teams.

Click through the measures under “Building After” to understand the components of the building’s energy transition.

Sequence of Measures

2022

2023

2024

2025

2030

Building System Affected

  • heating
  • cooling
  • ventilation
Penn One Building Before
Penn One Building After
Replace existing curtain wall glazing with triple pane insulated glazing unit (IGU)
Replace steam turbine chillers with high efficiency electric chillers
Replace constant volume induction units with Variable Air Volume (VAV) units as tenant spaces roll
Install WSHPs to reclaim rejected heat and offset building heating
Install ASHPs to partially electrify heating and inject heat to the secondary hot water system
Convert existing condenser water-cooled DX units to chilled water-cooled unites. Maximize heat recovery
Engage tenants during turnover to ensure best-in-class fit-out
Disable 24//7 cogeneration plant operation to eliminate most on-siite fossil-fuel usage and keep district steam as back-up; Maintain the Cogen plant as a resiliency and demand response asset
Install ASHPs to electrify the remaining heating load
Install thermal storage to offset peak demand and shift heating and cooling loads
Learn More

Reduce Energy Load 

  • Envelope Improvement: install new triple pane glazing 
  • Induction Units Replacement: replace constant volume perimeter induction units with VAV units 
  • Enhance Tenant Fit-out: Install high-efficiency equipment and engage with tenants to ensure best-in-class fit-out during turnover
  • Thermal Layering: Heating loads are sequenced and prioritized to first engage low-carbon resources to meet the building’s heating demand, and then use next-available or higher carbon-intense thermal resources to come online. For example, first use low carbon electric thermal resources from water-source heat pumps, and then utility steam to meet remaining demand. When the ASHPs are installed, they will be dispatched second, as another low carbon alternative. This approach makes it possible to meet peak heating loads during extreme cold events with relative ease and low carbon emissions.

Recover Wasted Heat 

  • Condenser Water Heat Recovery: This tactic will use water-source heat pumps (WSHP) to utilize heat from the condenser water system to supplement heating hot water for the building’s hydronic system. 
    • The WSHP method creates a “heat-lifting” machine that will raise the temperature of hot water to match the building’s existing supply – usefully extracting heat that would otherwise be wasted and reducing steam heat emissions. 
  • Computer Room Air Conditioning (CRAC) Conversion: Convert existing condenser water cooled DX units to chilled water-cooled units to maximize heat recovery and improve cooling efficiency

Partial Electrification: 

  • Electric Chillers: Replace steam turbine chillers to electric chillers 
  • Partial Air Source Heat Pumps: Install ASHPs to partially cover heating load served by the secondary hot water loop

Full Electrification: 

  • Cogen Decommissioning: Retire cogeneration plant and eliminate on-site fossil fuel usage; keep district steam as back-up
  • Thermal Storage: Install thermal storage systems to enable full-building electrification by shifting and support heating and cooling peaks and empower grid flexibility 
  • More ASHPs: Install ASHPs to cover remaining heating load

Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

Retrofit Costs

Decarbonization Costs

$4.15M

Capital costs of decarbonization (est. in 2025 $).

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Costs

$8.01M

Energy cost savings (2026–2050 [25 yrs]): 3.56M.

Repairs and maintenance savings: 99k.

BAU cost of system replacement/upgrades: 2.7M.

Residual cost (remaining equipment value): 764k.

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Risks

$724k

LL97 fines avoided starting in 2030.

Added Value

Decarbonization Value

$1M

Incentives.

Net Present Value

$1.015M

Net difference between the present value of cash inflows and outflows over a period of time.

Learn More

Heat recovery remains a very costly endeavor. Even with the Empire Challenge award of $1 million, the energy savings alone yields a payback in excess of 7 years. Compared to other energy conservation measures with rapid ROIs, this is not in the realm of being a “no-brainer.” However, unlike other retrofits or upgrades that target electricity savings, this project reduces our future reliance on district steam, a utility that is expected to undergo very high cost escalations as they incorporate renewables into their production.

An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

Strategic decarbonization roadmap for PENN 1.
Learn More

The Vornado team has gained countless lessons-learned on their decarbonization planning journey. The following are essential insights from the project team:

Insights from the energy model

The predictive energy model revealed that while the renovations to the building will yield significant energy and carbon reductions, the energy consumption from tenant spaces, such as computer and plug loads, must also be significantly reduced and intelligently managed to drive down the carbon intensity of the building (and reduce/eliminate exposure to LL97 through the 2030 compliance period).

While every effort was made to ensure that the model reflects the design team’s best understanding of the building’s existing conditions and future usage, the modeled energy consumption, energy cost, and carbon emission estimates will likely vary from the actual energy, cost, and carbon of the building after construction. This is due to variables such as weather, occupancy, building operation and maintenance, changes in energy rates, changes in carbon emission coefficients, and energy uses not covered by the modeling scope.

Underscoring the importance of an iterative design process

In the first iteration of the decarbonization strategy, the Vornado team approached the project with an all-or-nothing electrification mindset. They found that the strategies that achieve the deepest levels of decarbonization through fully eliminating district steam and co-generation waste heat as heating sources may not be practical nor cost efficient to implement in such a complex existing building. So, they went back to the drawing board.

In the second iteration of the project, a more holistic strategy emphasizing the following core principles was developed:

  • Re-use existing infrastructure (i.e., piping and ductwork) where possible
  • Recovery wasted heat from internal loads
  • Electrify heating loads affordably with heat pumps
  • Compress space requirements for electrification equipment/systems
  • Dispatch thermally stored energy to shift and smooth loads to promote grid flexibility

Resource Efficient Electrification framework: With these guiding principles, the Vornado team developed a new strategy that follows the  Resource Efficient Decarbonization Framework, which JB&B refers to as “Reduce, Recycle, Electrify”. Phasing, cost compression, and space compression were prioritized so that measures are more likely to be installed and scaled to other Vornado properties.

Key takeaways on the broader decarbonization decision-making process

  • Invest in a Calibrated Energy Model – In large and complex buildings, building owners should commission a decarbonization study with an investment-grade calibrated energy model. Energy models should be custom built to the building’s unique characteristics, ensuring the analysis of retrofits are accurate and adds confidence to decision making. An energy model is a flexible tool that captures interactivity of all systems and ensures the strategies and measures studied have realistic energy and carbon reduction projections.
  • Just Because It’s Feasible Doesn’t Mean It’s Practical – Anything is possible in an energy model. Technical teams must be aware that building ownership teams care about more than just the energy and carbon results from the model. Strategies must be practical in real-world scenarios and should aim to re-use existing infrastructure where possible, minimize disruption, use space efficiently, and compress costs as much as possible. Technical teams must be prepared to show building owners how a particular measure will be installed practically.
  • Don’t Expect 5–7 Year Paybacks on Decarbonization Measures – Deep decarbonization measures will likely have long paybacks. This is due to high upfront costs of electrification technology, supporting infrastructure, and invasive retrofitting. Working against these high-efficient electric systems is the price of electricity, which is 5 to 6 times more expensive per unit of energy than natural gas. Simple payback analyses are unable to capture the true value of decarbonization investments, including non-energy benefits. Ownership teams have to adjust their payback expectations when considering deep decarbonization measures. 
  • Technological Innovation Isn’t the Only Innovation – There is new and exciting technology out there that has the potential to revolutionize the way we electrify buildings, but in the meantime, there are innovative approaches to electrifying buildings today with currently available technology. Purposeful dispatch of thermal energy sources and optimization for scalability, practicality, and affordability are innovative strategies. 
  • Conditioning Exhaust Air – Recycling waste heat from exhaust air streams isn’t a new idea, but using the refrigeration cycle to extract and lift heat from exhaust air streams to serve heating loads is a new and innovative concept. Essentially, by air conditioning the exhaust air, like traditionally avoided toilet exhaust, heat can be recovered and lifted to higher temperatures by a heat pump to offset heating loads. The reverse is also true in the summertime, where exhaust air can serve as a heat rejection medium for the chilled water production of chiller plants. 
  • Potential of Low Temperature Hot Water in Existing Chilled Water Coils Low temperature hot water enables heat recovery and air source heat pumps to have a big impact, but reconfiguring all comfort heating systems in existing buildings to be low temperature is difficult and costly. The following approach offers a more practical alternative:
  • Partially electrify high temperature hot water systems (i.e., perimeter systems) with water-source heat pumps and condenser heat recovery. This allows existing distribution infrastructure to stay in place – critical to wider spread of heat pump adoption. 
  • Transition air handling unit steam or hot water coils to low temperature, which can be served by air source heat pumps. The cost and scope of coil replacements is much more manageable than replacing all heating systems with low temperature hot water infrastructure. In some cases, existing chilled water coils can be used with low temperature hot water and become a modified change-over coil, negating the cost of replacement. 
  • Operations Team Integration: These decarbonization strategies are new and complex. Existing operations teams must be part of the design and implementation of these systems and training is of critical importance. A system that is designed to be low-carbon will not be successful if it is not operated per the design intent and understood thoroughly by those operating them. 
  • Disruption and Phasing: Some of the best decarbonization strategies are also some of the most disruptive. Phasing must be based upon several factors including the rate of grid decarbonization, leasing turnover cycles, capital planning cycles, and equipment nearing its end of useful life. 

More Like This

Case Study
Case Study

Empire State Building

New York City icon reaches for carbon neutrality
Empire State Building Case Study
Case Study
Case Study

660 Fifth Avenue

High-rise implements heat pumps and outdoor air systems for decarbonization
660 Fifth Avenue Case Study

Case Study

A Rational Approach to Large Building Decarbonization

Project Status

Planning

Under Construction

Monitoring & Evaluation

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
Asset Conditions
Market Conditions
Learn More

Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

Learn More

Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

Retrofit Costs

Decarbonization Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Risks

Added Value

Decarbonization Value

Net Present Value
Learn More

An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

Learn More

Lessons from New York’s Empire Building Challenge

This article, published in NESEA’s BuildingEnergy magazine (Vol. 40 No. 1), addresses common “decarbonization blind spots” that impede progress and shares insights gained from the incremental methodology and integrated design process pioneered through NYSERDA’s Empire Building Challenge.

More Like This

Sorry, no content found.

Case Study

Technical Barriers to Decarbonization

Project Status

Planning

Under Construction

Monitoring & Evaluation

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
Asset Conditions
Market Conditions
Learn More

Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

Learn More

Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

Retrofit Costs

Decarbonization Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Risks

Added Value

Decarbonization Value

Net Present Value
Learn More

An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

Learn More

Insights from Empire Building Challenge

Large commercial and residential buildings must overcome various hurdles before implementing deep retrofits or capital projects that help achieve building decarbonization. This section addresses technical barriers and questions often faced by building owners and retrofit project developers.

Decentralized Systems and Tenant Equipment

  • Access to Occupied Spaces.
  • Lease Concerns.
  • Regulatory Limitations of Rent Stabilized Apartments.
    • The building owner is required to provide free heat and hot water.
    • No mechanism to recover investment in new systems is necessary to achieve decarbonization.
    • Buildings are capital constrained.
  • Split Incentives (e.g. tenants pay for energy).

Facade and Windows

  • Work must be completed at the end of facade/window useful life; very long useful life.
  • Building codes.
  • Glazing reduction at odds with aesthetic/marketability concerns.
  • Difficult installing with occupied spaces.
  • Reduce Local Law 11 recurring cost via overcladding
    • Aesthetic concerns
    • At odds with historic preservation
    • Capital intensive
    • Lot line limitations
  • Technology Limitations
    • Need higher R-value/inch for thinner wall assembly:
      • Vacuum insulated panels
      • Aerogel panels/batts
      • Zero-GWP blowing agents for closed cell spray foam (nitrogen blowing agent needs to be more widely adopted)

Ventilation

  • Energy Recovery Ventilation (ERV)
    • Space constraints
    • System tie-in point accessibility/feasibility
  • Rooftop Supply Air (Reznor) Unit Alternatives
    • Heat pump alternatives to eliminate resistance heat
    • Combine with ERV
  • HVAC Load Reduction (HLR) Technology
    • Vent or capture exhaust gases
    • Space constraints
    • System tie-in point accessibility/feasibility
  • Central vs. Decentralized Ventilation Systems
  • Direct Outside Air System (DOAS)
    • Modular perimeter ducted air heat pumps:
      • Competition for leasable space
      • Space constraints
  • Ventilation Points-of-Entry
    • Aesthetic concerns
    • Lot line facades/building setbacks
    • Competition with leasable space
    • Space constraints

Heat Pump Limitations

  • Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF)
    • Fire and life safety concerns about volume of refrigerant gas located within occupied spaces.
  • Regulatory risk from new refrigerant policies
  • PTAC and VTAC
  • Ducted Supply/Exhaust Air Source Heat Pumps
  • Domestic Hot Water
    • Central DHW Systems:
      • Limited domestic production.
      • Performance not confirmed by independent third parties.
      • More demonstration projects needed.
    • Decentralized DHW Systems
  • More open-source interconnection between devices/interoperability is needed to achieve energy distribution flexibility and capacity expansion:
    • Air source that has a manifold connection to interconnect with water source or refrigerant gas distribution.
    • Interconnectivity/simplified heat exchange between refrigerants/water/air, etc.
    • Other options and add-ons.

Steam Alternatives and Barriers

Below are high temperature renewable resource alternatives to district steam. These alternatives are limited and face barriers to implementation due to cost, scalability, and other factors. 

  • Deep Bore Geothermal
  • Renewable Hydrogen
  • Carbon Capture and Sequestration
  • Biomethane
  • Electric Boilers
  • High-temperature thermal storage
  • Hight-temperature industrial heat pumps
  • Waste Heat Capture and Reuse
  • Fission

Barriers to Electrification and Utility Capacity Limitations

Building Electric Capacity Upgrades

  • Electric riser capacity
  • Switchgear expansion
  • New service/vault expansion/point-of-entry space constraints
  • Capacity competition with other electrification needs:
    • Space heat and cooling
    • DHW
    • Cooking
    • Pumps and motors

Local Network Electric Capacity Upgrades

  • Excess Distribution Facility Charges (EDF)
  • Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC)

Gas Utility Earnings Adjustment Mechanisms (EAM) focused on System Peak Demand Reductions

  • Partial Electrification concepts achieve deep decarbonization but do not necessarily achieve peak gas demand reductions (debatable)

Total Connected Loads and Peak Demand drive need for capacity upgrades

  • Demand reduction strategies do not obviate capacity limitations unless the utility accepts the solution as a permanent demand/load reduction strategy.
    • Battery Storage:
      1. Fire danger
      2. Space constraints
      3. Electricity distribution limitations
      4. Structural loads
    • Building Automation/BMS/Demand Response:
      1. Cost
      2. Integration limitations; Blackbox software
      3. Microgrid development cost and lack of expertise
    • On-site Generation:
      1. Space constraints
      2. Gas use; Zero carbon fuels availability is non-existent
      3. Structural loads
      4. Pipe infrastructure

Thermal Storage

  • Space constrains
  • Structural loads
  • Technology limitations:
    • Vacuum insulated storage tanks
    • Phase change material (DHW, space heating)

Geothermal (ambient temperature), Deep Bore Geothermal (high temperature) or Shared Loop District Energy Systems provide cooling and heating with lower peak demand than standard electric equipment

  • Building pipe riser limitations; need additional riser capacity:
    • Building water loops are typically “top down” – cooling capacity is typically located at rooftop mechanical penthouses; cooling towers at roof. Some exceptions to this rule
    • Space Constraints
  • Drilling Difficulty:
    • Outdoor space constraints for geothermal wells
    • Difficult permitting
    • Mud and contaminated soil disposal
    • Overhead clearance constraints for drilling in basements/garages 
  • Shared Loop/Thermal Utility Limitations:
    • Requires entity that may operate in public ROWs and across property lines
    • Utilities are limited by regulations for gas, steam or electric delivery versus shared loop media (ambient temperature water).
      1. Only utility entities can provide very long amortization periods
      2. Utilities are best suited to work amid crowded underground municipal ROWs.
  • Deep Bore Geothermal Limitations:
    • Requires test drilling and geological assessment
    • Seismic risk
    • Drilling equipment is very large – more akin to oil and gas development equipment
    • Subsurface land rights and DEC restrictions

Other Energy Efficiency/Conservation Measures with proven/attractive economics (these measures are limited by lack of capital or knowledge)

  • Lighting with lighting controls
  • High-efficiency electrically commutated motors (ECM)
  • Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) on pumps and motors
  • Retro-commissioning tasks and maintenance

Behavioral Modification

  • Staggered work scheduling
  • Telework

Submetering and billing, potentially creates split incentive between landlord and tenant

Crossover Device or “Magic Box” Technology

These include multi-purpose technology for heating, cooling, heat exchange and ventilation, filtration, and/or domestic hot water.

  • Domestic production and supply chain is limited.
  • Small players operating in this space.
  • Technology is not tested over long operational periods (providers include: Daikin, Nilan, Zehnder, Drexel und Weiss, Minotair, Build Equinox, Clivet).

Zero Carbon Fuel Limitations

  • Green Hydrogen
  • Renewable Natural Gas

Low-Carbon Fuels

  • Biofuel
  • Biomethane

Renewable Energy Procurement Limitations

  • REC Purchasing:
    • NYSERDA monopolizes REC purchasing from renewable energy projects.

Pending Carbon Trading Programs Limitations

  • Deployment timeline is highly uncertain.
  • Price per ton of carbon is highly uncertain and will likely be volatile/low based on previous emissions trading scheme outcomes.

More Like This

Sorry, no content found.

Case Study

Low Carbon Multifamily Retrofit Playbooks

Project Status

Planning

Under Construction

Monitoring & Evaluation

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
Asset Conditions
Market Conditions
Learn More

Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

Learn More

Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

Retrofit Costs

Decarbonization Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Risks

Added Value

Decarbonization Value

Net Present Value
Learn More

An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

Learn More

These playbooks summarize retrofit strategies that maximize occupant comfort and energy savings through a transition from fuel to electricity- based heating, cooling and hot water systems.

Playbooks are organized by building system— lighting & loads, envelope, ventilation, heating & cooling, and domestic hot water– detailing common existing systems, typical issues, and recommended measures.

More Like This

Sorry, no content found.

Case Study

Empire Technology Prize

Project Status

Planning

Under Construction

Monitoring & Evaluation

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
Asset Conditions
Market Conditions
Learn More

Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

Learn More

Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

Retrofit Costs

Decarbonization Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Risks

Added Value

Decarbonization Value

Net Present Value
Learn More

An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

Learn More

The Empire Technology Prize is a $10 million competitive opportunity for global solution providers focused on advancing building technologies for low-carbon heating system retrofits in tall commercial and multifamily buildings across New York State. This NYSERDA initiative, administered by The Clean Fight with technical support from Rocky Mountain Institute, includes a $3 million sponsorship from Wells Fargo. Accelerating low-carbon building retrofits is fundamental to New York State’s national-leading Climate Act agenda, including the goal to achieve an 85% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

More Like This

Sorry, no content found.

Case Study

Intervention Points and Best Practices

Project Status

Planning

Under Construction

Monitoring & Evaluation

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
Asset Conditions
Market Conditions
Learn More

Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

Learn More

Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

Retrofit Costs

Decarbonization Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Risks

Added Value

Decarbonization Value

Net Present Value
Learn More

An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

Learn More

Insights from Empire Building Challenge

Prioritizing Decarbonization Interventions 

While each individual building has a unique capital improvement plan and timeline, retrofit projects or decarbonization interventions may be organized and grouped by similarity as property owners plan for the future. Below is the overarching hierarchy for decarbonization intervention points according to industry best practices:

  1. Facade Upgrades
  2. Windows Upgrades
  3. Ventilation Upgrades with Energy Recovery Ventilators (ERV)
  4. Maximize the reduction of distribution temperatures
  5. Maximize surface area of terminal units
  6. Supplement 90% of peak load with hybrid electrification strategies
  7. Eliminate peak load “last-mile” with innovative strategies in storage and/or thermal demand response
  • Delay replacement of gas-fired equipment with new gas-fired equipment as long as possible. Rebuild and maintain existing equipment until replacement.
  • Replace all remaining non-LED lighting and include lighting controls at the time of retrofit
  • Seal rooftop bulkhead doors and windows.
  • Add smoke-activated fire dampers or annealed glass to the elevator shaft vent grill in the elevator machine room.
  • Install algorithmic controls on top of the existing boiler control system.
  • Balance steam distribution systems:
    • Identify condensate return leaks.
    • Right-size air vents and master vents.
    • Ensure all radiators are properly draining condensate.
    • Ensure all steam traps are functioning properly.
  • Implement Radiator Efficiency and Controls Measures:
    • Install thermostatic radiator valves (TRV) where possible.
    • Install RadiatorLabs radiator cover systems where possible (integrate with algorithmic boiler control).
  • Balance air supply and ventilation systems using proper air registers, louvers, dampers, and technology like Constant Airflow Regulator (CAR) dampers:
    • Need innovative methods of balancing temperature across commercial office floors (heat shifting and sharing from one building exposure to another, e.g. north vs. south).
    • Balance air supply and return across vertical pressure gradients.
    • Seal vent stack perforations/leaks (e.g. mastic sealer).
  • Increase efficiency of pumps and motors:
    • Add VFD controllers to all pumps and motors.
    • Replace rooftop exhaust fans (e.g. mushroom fans or similar) with electronic commutated motors.
  • Implement algorithmic controls on top of existing Building Management Systems (BMS) in commercial office buildings.
  • Hybrid Domestic Hot Water (DHW) Plants: Add DHW heat pump equipment to an existing gas fired DHW plant.
    • Consider the option to direct bathroom exhaust air to DHW heat pump equipment.
  • Install Energy Recovery Ventilation (ERV) system.
  • Install rooftop solar.
  • Procure New York State-sourced renewable power.
  • Procure biomethane from utility via pilot program.
  • Procure renewable hydrogen blend from utility via pilot program.
  • Develop innovative means of participating in gas demand response:
    • Delay boiler firing with controls or other means.
    • Procure biodiesel blend for fuel switching requirement.
    • Thermal storage and hybrid plants (electrification)
      • DHW electrification (partial or full load)
      • Split system or PTAC partial load heating electrification
  • Add central-control compatible thermostats to apartments and office suites to control decentralized heating and cooling systems.
    • Enable aggregate demand response activity.
  • Fully electrify DHW systems:
    • Air source DHW heat pump.
    • Resistance DHW.
    • High-efficiency thermal storage.
    • Supplement with solar thermal where compatible.
  • Overlaid or insulated masonry facades with high ongoing Local Law 11 cost.
  • Eliminate uninsulated radiator cabinets/niches in exterior walls.
    • Install wall-mounted slim radiators with TRV or other controls.
    • Install RadiatorLabs technology.
  • Begin routine window replacement plan with high-performance windows.
  • Support cogeneration systems with biomethane (injection) procurement.
  • Explore hydrogen (injection) procurement to support cogeneration and centralized heating plants.
  • Develop on-site battery storage systems to manage building load profiles and reduce peak usage.
    • Integrate with an existing on-site generation where compatible.
  • Increase thermal mass/thermal inertia and expand thermal storage capacity using Phase Change Material (PCM) products. Products currently include: ceiling tiles, wall panels, AHU inserts, thermal storage tank inserts:
    • Embrace overnight free cooling.
    • Shift loads associated with thermal demand.
    • Capture and store waste heat.
  • Implement centralized or in-building distributed thermal storage systems to shift thermal loads to off-peak periods.
  • Convert low-temperature heating distribution systems to shared loop systems or geothermal systems; building distribution is already optimized for low-temperature distribution: water source heat pumps, large surface area terminal units (radiant panels, underfloor heat, fan coils, etc.)
    • Interconnect with early shared loop system phases (private or utility-led).
    • Eliminate cooling tower as a primary cooling system (may remain as a backup as feasible).
  • Where necessary, convert high-temperature heating distribution systems to low-temperature distribution systems; systems converted from fin tube to radiant panels, fan coils, or water source heat pumps as feasible.
    • The supplement heat source for hydronic heat pumps with solar thermal technology (water source heat pumps).
  • Embrace consumer products that reduce building loads and peak demand:
    • Appliances with onboard battery storage.
    • Networked smart appliances.
    • Power over Ethernet (PoE) DC-powered, low voltage products.
      • DC power distribution networks make use of on-site renewable energy and energy storage.
  • Advanced DC[1] and AC/DC hybrid Power Distribution Systems[2]
  • Install HVAC Load Reduction Technology:
    • Capture VOCs and CO2 in liquid sorbent.
    • Engage with the liquid sorbent management company to safely dispose of scrubbed gases (carbon sequestration, etc.).
    • Use buildings hosts for negative carbon technology and focusing on direct air capture to achieve larger decarbonization goals (carbon capture and sequestration)
  • Electric Distribution Upgrade Needed:
    • Begin replacement of centralized heating systems with decentralized heating and cooling systems where appropriate. Technology includes: PTAC, VTAC, ducted PTAC, VRF, and similar technology.
    • Replace stoves, ranges, and cooktops with electric equipment: resistance, convection, or induction.
    • Integrate Building Distribution with an advanced electric vehicle (EV) charging network to provide power to parked EVs and to extract power at peak periods (EV owners opt-in for reduced parking rates, other benefits, etc.).
  • Install multi-function glass during window or facade replacement:
    • Install building-integrated PV during facade retrofits.
    • PV glass.
    • Electrochromic glass.
    • Vacuum Insulated glass.
  • Install highly insulated panels at spandrels:
    • Vacuum insulated panels.
    • Aerogel insulated panels.
  • Replace cooling towers with advanced heat rejection technology:
    • Passive radiative cooling technology.
  • Interconnect with 100% hydrogen distribution network.
  • Pair advanced, on-site battery storage systems with hydrogen fuel cells.

More Like This

Sorry, no content found.

Case Study

Whitney Young Manor

Recapitalization to achieve carbon neutral affordable housing

Located in Yonkers, NY, Whitney Young Manor, is a notable affordable housing complex with 195 apartments across 234,000 square feet and 12 stories. Built in 1974, the housing complex is now undergoing a $22 million makeover focusing heavily on decarbonization upgrades. This renovation aims to modernize the buildings by improving insulation and introducing a new heating and cooling system that’s energy efficient. These changes are expected to lower the buildings’ carbon footprint, enhance living conditions, and reduce energy costs. The developer, Paths Development LLC, is leveraging the recapitalization cycle of the property to upgrade its infrastructure and include decarbonization measures to meet its climate goals. 

Whitney Young Manor Building

Project Status

Planning

Under Construction

Monitoring & Evaluation

Investment

12 million

of total investment allocated to bring Whitney Young Manor to carbon neutrality by 2035.

Project Scale

Project has potential replication across a portfolio of 51 existing affordable housing developments managed by Paths.

Original facade
Testimonial

“The Empire Building Challenge is enabling Paths to pilot innovative approaches to decarbonization while at the same time helping to preserve affordable housing.”

Kenneth Spillberg

Head of Development

Paths Development LLC

Emissions Reductions

This project prioritizes intensive load reduction through envelope improvements and hydronic distribution to improve resident comfort while reducing carbon emissions, utility spend and maintenance costs.

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
  • Equipment nearing end-of-life
  • New heat source potential
  • Comfort improvements
  • Indoor air quality improvements
  • Facade maintenance
  • Resilience upgrades
  • Efficiency improvements
Asset Conditions
  • Recapitalization
  • Carbon emissions limits
  • Owner sustainability goals
Market Conditions
  • Technology improves
  • Utility prices change
  • Fuels phase out
Learn More

Whitney Young Manor is an aging affordable housing complex with open balconies, inefficient electric resistance baseboard heating, electric wall sleeve AC units, and gas-fired domestic hot water heaters. 

The project team believes that with care, planning, and the appropriate resources, retrofitting these residential buildings can  better serve  tenants, deliver  environmental benefits, and prove financially feasible for owners. Paths leverages the recapitalization cycle of the property to upgrade its infrastructure and include decarbonization measures to meet its climate goals. 

This project prioritizes intensive load reduction through envelope improvements and hydronic distribution to improve resident comfort while reducing carbon emissions, utility spending, and maintenance costs.

Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

Existing Conditions

This diagram illustrates the building prior to the initiation of Strategic Decarbonization planning by the owners and their teams.

Click through the measures under “Building After” to understand the components of the building’s energy transition.

Sequence of Measures

2024

2025

Building System Affected

  • heating
  • cooling
  • ventilation
Whitney Young Manor Building Before
Whitney Young Manor Building After
EIFS over uninsulated masonry, new windows, new roof
New hydronic piping drilled through common areas
Install 2 ASHPs to produce low temperature hot water and chilled water for in-unit FCUs
For use during power outages and extreme cold events
2-Pipe Low Temperature Fan Coils installed in units
Heat pump DOAS with ERV to recover heat from exhausted air to provide tempered supply air to the corridors
Install modular WSHPs supplied by hydronic loop
Install 18,000 gal sewage tank and use Sharc Energy’s heat recovery system and water-to-water heat pump to supplement central ASHPs
Learn More

Reduce Energy Load 

Whitney Young Manor demonstrates the benefits of over- cladding and hydronic distribution to enable heat pump technology: 

  • New hydronic distribution: High efficiency water-based distribution system, lower supply temperature 
    • The new hydronic distribution piping will enable the integration of different heating sources and allow heat sharing between end uses, such as DHW production during cooling season. The construction team plans to pilot cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) piping to reduce cost and improve durability. 
  • Dedicated Outside Air System (DOAS): decouple ventilation from heat and cooling systems 
  • Envelope Improvements: overclad, roof insulation and window replacement
    •  Over-cladding using Exterior Insulation and Finishing System (EIFS) helps reduce heat loss and air infiltration while avoiding façade maintenance costs associated with LL11. This measure is combined with the new Dedicated Outside Air System (DOAS) to make sure adequate fresh air is injected into the building. 

Recover Wasted Heat 

The project team plans to integrate different heat sources connected to the central hydronic piping. This includes centralized air source heat pumps, Wastewater Energy Transfer (WET) system and gas-fired condensing boilers as back-up.

  • Wastewater Heat Recovery: Recapture heat from wastewater using WSHP 
  • Energy Recovery Ventilator (ERV): Recapture heat from ventilation exhaust to condition make-up air

Electrification 

  • Central Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP): Maintain design temperatures for the hydronic loop
  • Water Source Heat Pump (WSHP) for Domestic Hot Water (DHW): DHW production supplied by hydronic loop 
  • Back-up gas condensing boiler: Provide supplemental heat during cold events as resiliency

Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

Retrofit Costs

Decarbonization Costs

$12M

Capital costs of decarbonization measures. 

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Costs

$1.92M

Energy cost savings, repairs and maintenance savings, BAU cost of system replacement and upgrades.

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Risks

N/A

LL97 emissions fines don’t apply at this property.

Added Value

Decarbonization Value

$6.14M

Incentives from Empire Building Challenge, Low-Carbon Pathways Program, and ConEd Clean Heat.

Net Present Value

TBD

Net difference between the present value of cash inflows and outflows over a period of time.

Learn More

Paths Development LLC is a division of Paths, a full-scale, vertically integrated affordable housing developer, builder, and operator. Since 2004, the Paths team has created and preserved high-quality affordable housing across the U.S. that enhances communities and helps residents build better lives. With other 12,000 units across 9 states under management and more than 300 employees, Paths manages a suite of capabilities spanning the entire property life-cycle, including: development, construction, property management, maintenance, and security.

An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

Strategic decarbonization roadmap for Whitney Young Manor.
Learn More

More Like This

Case Study
Case Study

The Heritage

Fully occupied mixed-income property pursues facade retrofit
The Heritage Case Study
Case Study
Case Study

The Victory

Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

The Victory Case Study
Case Study
Case Study

The Towers

Oldest US multifamily co-op transforms wastewater into clean energy
The Towers Case Study

Case Study

Advanced Building Construction Collaborative Case Studies

Project Status

Planning

Under Construction

Monitoring & Evaluation

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
Asset Conditions
Market Conditions
Learn More

Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

Learn More

Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

Retrofit Costs

Decarbonization Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Risks

Added Value

Decarbonization Value

Net Present Value
Learn More

An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

Learn More

These case studies cover projects that will dramatically reduce carbon emissions with deep energy retrofits for affordable multifamily housing in the Boston area. Deep energy retrofits dramatically reduce carbon emissions. These renovations transform affordable housing to be highly energy efficient, all-electric, powered by clean renewable energy, and renovated with materials low in embodied carbon. These projects are part of the Advanced Building Construction Collaborative’s demand aggregation. This work aims to demonstrate streamlined deep energy retrofits and retrofits using advanced building construction techniques to accelerate the adoption of this work in the market.

More Like This

Sorry, no content found.

Case Study

Empire Technology Prize Market Insight Report 

Project Status

Planning

Under Construction

Monitoring & Evaluation

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
Asset Conditions
Market Conditions
Learn More

Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

Learn More

Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

Retrofit Costs

Decarbonization Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Costs

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Risks

Added Value

Decarbonization Value

Net Present Value
Learn More

An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

Learn More

The Empire Technology Prize team has produced the New York State Market Insight and Characterization report, which explores the technical challenges posed by achieving efficient decarbonization of heating systems and explores alternatives in two focus areas: high temperature heat pumps, and minimally disruptive distribution system solutions. 

More Like This

Sorry, no content found.