Case Study

Mt. Pleasant

Multifamily affordable building electrifies with ground-source heat pumps

This case study was chosen as part of the Empire Building Challenge competition. Click here to learn more about the Empire Building Challenge competition.

The Mt. Pleasant retrofit project demonstrates an effective full-decarbonization roadmap for installing renewable ground-source space conditioning in existing multifamily buildings across New York City. Ascendant’s Mt. Pleasant is a nine story affordable, senior housing building built in 1996 in East Harlem. The decarbonization plan for this building includes envelope improvements in the form of added roof, window, and wall insulation, as well as a ground source heat pump system to be implemented in the rear yard and parking lot that will harness ground temperatures to heat and cool the building’s 50,003 square feet.

Ascendant is an East Harlem based non-profit company that manages 28 affordable apartment buildings. The retrofit project at Mt. Pleasant aligns with Ascendant’s history of green initiatives and resiliency improvements, as well as their broader commitment to the environment and sustainability.

Mt. Pleasant
Energy Savings

74%

Anticipated 74% energy savings from 2022 baseline after retrofit implementation.

Project Planning
Space heating boilers

Assessment shows East Harlem affordable housing site is viable for ground source heat pump system installation.

Project Planning

The decarbonization roadmap for Mt. Pleasant includes a whole building retrofit of the envelope and systems to first reduce energy usage in the building and then electrify all heating and appliances.

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
  • New heat source potential
  • Comfort improvements
  • Indoor air quality improvements
  • Facade maintenance
  • Resilience upgrades
Asset Conditions
  • Capital event cycles
  • Owner sustainability goals
Market Conditions
  • Technology improves

The decarbonization efforts at Mt. Pleasant were triggered by Ascendant’s efforts to reduce the carbon footprint of their building portfolio. Ascendant determined that NYSERDA’s Empire Building Challenge would be a good opportunity to accomplish electrification and energy reduction goals that would otherwise require a patchwork of funding sources. Mt. Pleasant and Ascendant’s other EBC entry, All Saints, were chosen as the two most suitable buildings to this challenge in terms of size, and overall potential impact. For Mt. Pleasant, most of the building equipment is still functional but nearing its recommended date for replacement. The condition of existing equipment meant there was time to develop a roadmap for building improvements but also good reason to replace existing equipment with low-carbon systems

Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

Existing Conditions

This diagram illustrates the building prior to the initiation of Strategic Decarbonization planning by the owners and their teams.

Click through the measures under “Building After” to understand the components of the building’s energy transition.

Sequence of Measures

2025

2033

2034

Building System Affected

  • heating
  • cooling
  • ventilation
Mt Pleasant before
Mt Pleasant after
Geothermal System for Heating, Cooling and DHW
In-unit Fan Coil Units
Envelope Improvements
Energy Recovery Ventilators
Low Flow Fixtures
Dryer Electrification with Heat Pump Dryers
Cooking Electrification with Induction Stoves

Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

Retrofit Costs

Decarbonization Costs

$6.9M

Capital costs of decarbonization (e.g. total cost to install all measures): 6.9M.

Cost of ECM #1: Install Geothermal System: 2.96M.

Cost of ECM #2: Exterior Wall Insulation: 900k.

Cost of ECM #3: Roof Insulation: 260k.

Cost of ECM #4: Energy Recovery Ventilation (ERVs): 530k.

Cost of ECM #5: Low Flow Fixtures: 39.7k.

Cost of ECM #6: Electric Allowance: 1.1M.

Cost of ECM #7: Window Replacement: 770k.

Cost of ECM #8: Electric Dryers: 5.5k.

Cost of ECM #9: Electric Ranges: 220k.

 

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Costs

$271k + $14k / YR + $119k / 5 YR

Energy cost savings: $14k / YR.

Repairs and maintenance savings: 119k / 5 YR

BAU cost of system replacement/upgrades: 271k.

Avoided Risks

Business-as-Usual Risks

$0

Local Law 97 or other regulatory fines: N/A

Added Value

Decarbonization Value

$6.7M

Incentives: 6.7M.

Net Present Value

-$357

Negative due to incentive contributions

Mt. Pleasant is an affordable, multifamily building with limited funds available to invest in an electrification project. As such, incentives, grants, and loans are vital for carrying out this roadmap. The initial capital costs for the EBC phase of the roadmap will be covered by incentives and grants. The annual utility costs for the building are projected to decrease slightly despite transitioning from gas to the more expensive electricity for heating, cooking, and laundry. Replacement of cooking and laundry appliances are an unavoidable cost, as these systems must be replaced at the end of their useful life regardless of the electrification initiative. The cost of induction electric cooking may be more expensive than existing costs for gas cooking, but savings from the broader retrofit result in lower overall operational costs and electric cooking is much safer for all residents.

An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

Strategic Decarbonization Roadmap

The decarbonization roadmap for Mt. Pleasant includes a whole building retrofit of the envelope and systems to first reduce energy usage in the building and then electrify all heating and appliances. The planned envelope improvements include adding roof insulation, exterior wall insulation, and replacing windows. Supply ventilation will also be added to the apartments and exhaust fans will be replaced with energy recovery ventilators which will further reduce the conditioned air typically lost to the outside. The geothermal system will be sized based on the reduced heating and cooling loads, with boreholes buried under the existing parking lot. Engineers determined that a geothermal system was viable and our team investigated whether the existing hydronic distribution system could be used. However, because a geothermal system needs to be balanced with heating and cooling loads, re-piping was determined to be the simplest and most cost-effective way to add hydronic cooling pipes. Other methods would require similarly invasive construction but with more equipment. The energy conservation measures and geothermal system will be implemented by 2027. The remaining laundry and cooking electrification will occur in 2033 and 2034 respectively, or when existing equipment fails.

More Like This

Case Study
NYSERDA supported
Case Study

The Victory

Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

The Victory Case Study
Case Study
Case Study

The Towers

Oldest US multifamily co-op transforms wastewater into clean energy
The Towers Case Study

Case Study

St. Elizabeth Manor

Renewing multifamily senior housing with sustainable electrification

This case study was chosen as part of the Empire Building Challenge competition. Click here to learn more about the Empire Building Challenge competition.

St. Elizabeth Manor is a 4-story, 80-unit multifamily senior-housing building located at 150 Brielle Avenue in Staten Island, New York. The 61,320 GSF building was constructed in 1994 and has not undergone any major renovations since. Besides utilizing natural gas for space heating and domestic hot water production in the cellar, the rest of the building and all apartments run on electricity. Existing systems and infrastructure are mostly original to the building and nearing the end of their useful lives. The goal is to revive the building by improving the envelope, electrifying heating and hot water systems, installing heat recovery systems for ventilation, and installing wastewater heat recovery systems. Sisters of Charity Housing Development has 17 total buildings in their portfolio which includes 1272 total dwelling units. The owner’s goal is to replicate the above measures in all the buildings that have similar existing conditions, which will impact 804 dwelling units.

St. Elizabeth Manor
Conditions Assessment

High gas consumption and deteriorating existing conditions are driving the decision to decarbonize St. Elizabeth Manor.

Project Planning

Added wall insulation, weather stripping, and ventilation improvements, will significantly reduce heating loads at the site.

Project Planning

Space heating and water heaters will be electrified using cold climate packaged terminal heat pumps and high performance blackwater source heat pumps.

A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

Building System Conditions
  • Equipment nearing end-of-life
  • Comfort improvements
  • Indoor air quality improvements
  • Efficiency improvements
Asset Conditions
  • Recapitalization
  • Carbon emissions limits
  • Owner sustainability goals
Market Conditions

    Considering the age of all original systems, the building is operating fairly but structurally failing with repairs needed to the face brick façade and roof which continue to experience water infiltration issues, particularly around the windows, roof flashing and bulkheads. Energy consumption associated with space heating and domestic hot water is high. The reasons for high space heating include high ventilation/infiltration, conductive heat losses through building envelope, and ageing boiler. The high infiltration is caused due to unbalanced ventilation, high exhaust rates, lack of energy recovery system, and weakening infrastructure. Domestic hot water consumption is high due to high flow rates from faucets/shower heads and ageing non-condensing water heaters.

    Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

    Existing Conditions

    This diagram illustrates the building prior to the initiation of Strategic Decarbonization planning by the owners and their teams.

    Click through the measures under “Building After” to understand the components of the building’s energy transition.

    Sequence of Measures

    2026

    2027

    Building System Affected

    • heating
    • cooling
    • ventilation
    St. Elizabeth Manor before
    St. Elizabeth Manor after
    Low Flow Fixtures
    Laundry Electrification
    Envelope Upgrades
    Ventilation Upgrades
    Wastewater Heat Recovery for DHW
    Packaged Terminal Heat Pumps (PTHP)
    Solar PV

    Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

    Retrofit Costs

    Decarbonization Costs

    $5.6M

    Cost of ECM #1: 1.7M.

    Cost of ECM #2: 875k.

    Cost of ECM #3: 679k.

    Cost of ECM #4: 210k.

    Cost of ECM #5: 86k.

    Non-EBC ECMs: 1.8M.

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Costs

    $51,242

    Energy cost savings

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Risks

    $0

    Added Value

    Decarbonization Value

    $2.6M

    Incentives

    Net Present Value

    $638,589

    The implementation of the Decarbonization Roadmap for Sisters of Charity’s Affordable Multifamily portfolio represents a strategic investment in both the environmental sustainability and long-term financial viability of the properties. By leveraging HUD’s Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) for Project Rental Assistance Contracts (PRAC) program to secure a 20-year Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contract for St. Elizabeth’s Manor, Sisters of Charity ensures a stable revenue stream that will significantly enhance the financial health of the property. This stable income will support the necessary debt service payments on a mortgage, enabling the funding of $13.2 million in capital improvements. These capital improvements are critical not only for the immediate physical needs of the property but also for achieving the long-term decarbonization goals outlined in the Roadmap. The integration of Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) as part of this comprehensive renovation plan will reduce operational expenses by decreasing energy consumption and fossil fuel dependency. The Roadmap’s capital plan, which combines mortgage proceeds, existing reserves, and subsidy financing from New York State’s Housing Finance Agency, is designed to minimize the financial burden on Sisters of Charity while maximizing the long-term return on investment. The use of this diversified funding strategy allows Sisters of Charity to undertake the necessary decarbonization measures without imposing additional financial strain on residents, as tenants will continue to pay only 30% of their income towards rent. Furthermore, the enhanced energy efficiency of the buildings will likely reduce long-term maintenance costs and improve the overall asset value, creating a more resilient financial model.

    An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

    Strategic Decarbonization Roadmap

    More Like This

    Case Study
    NYSERDA supported
    Case Study

    The Victory

    Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

    Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

    The Victory Case Study
    Case Study
    Case Study

    The Towers

    Oldest US multifamily co-op transforms wastewater into clean energy
    The Towers Case Study

    Case Study

    215 East 68th Street

    Electric heat recovery chiller implementation at Upper East Side high-rise

    This case study was chosen as part of the Empire Building Challenge competition. Click here to learn more about the Empire Building Challenge competition.

    215 East 68th Street is an approximately 1M+ square foot multifamily building in the Upper East Side of Manhattan. Built in 1962 and spanning 32 floors, the building supports tenant heating, cooling, and domestic hot water needs through natural gas boilers and absorption chillers. As a result, the building burns fossil fuels for the entire year, putting the building in Local Law 97 penalty range starting in 2030. Rudin Management plans to retrofit the outdated system with new electric heat recovery chillers to offset natural gas usage and align with New York City’s electrification efforts. The new system eliminates the need for fossil fuel boilers to create cooling and domestic hot water in the summer. The building also intends to install “geo-ready” thermal taps to prepare for a potential future ground loop under the existing parking lot and heat recovery from the 24/7 building exhaust system. The project largely decarbonizes building operations and aligns the building with company-wide sustainability goals.

    215 East 68th Street, Manhattan NY 10065
    Lessons Learned

    Heat pump technology is rapidly developing, creating cost-effective opportunities to decarbonize and electrify buildings without sacrificing operating costs.

    Emissions Reductions

     The proposed retrofit avoids penalties associated with Local Law 97 entirely, while also significantly reducing building energy use intensity.

    A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

    Building System Conditions
    • Equipment nearing end-of-life
    • Efficiency improvements
    Asset Conditions
    • Capital event cycles
    • Carbon emissions limits
    Market Conditions
    • Technology improves
    • Policy changes
    • Infrastructure transitions
    • Fuels phase out

    The last major cooling plant upgrade at 215 East 68th Street was in 2001 when three, low pressure steam absorption chillers were installed. Since then, NYC introduced new carbon emission limits as part of LL97. The new laws push for the electrification of buildings to mitigate significant financial penalties associated with burning fossil fuels. In the case of 215 East 68th Street, building ownership is facing annual penalties exceeding $250,000 per year starting in 2030. As a result, Rudin sees an opportunity to replace the fossil-fuel cooling plant with an electric plant that generates domestic hot water and recovers building waste heat. The new system eliminates the 2030 penalty entirely and significantly reduces the building energy use intensity (EUI).

    Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

    Existing Conditions

    This diagram illustrates the building prior to the initiation of Strategic Decarbonization planning by the owners and their teams.

    Click through the measures under “Building After” to understand the components of the building’s energy transition.

    Sequence of Measures

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    Building System Affected

    • heating
    • cooling
    • ventilation
    215 East 68th Street before
    215 East 68th Street after
    Heat Recovery Chillers
    Under Consideration: "Geo-Ready" Hydronic Connection
    Under Consideration: Condensing Boilers
    Exhaust Ventilation Heat recovery
    Under Consideration: Upgrade Air Handling Units (AHU)
    Under Consideration: Air Source Heat Pump Boilers
    Under Consideration: Exhaust Fan Heat Recovery Units (HRU)
    Under Consideration: Tie in Commercial Tenant's Condenser Water

    Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

    Retrofit Costs

    Decarbonization Costs

    $16M

    Cost of ECM #1: 1.2M.

    Cost of ECM #2: 14M.

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Costs

    $4.4M

    Energy cost savings: 477k.

    Repairs and maintenance savings: -150k.

    BAU  cost of system replacement/upgrades: 4.1M.

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Risks

    $2.7M

    Local Law 97 or other regulatory fines:

    2030-2034: 294k.

    2035-2039: 483k.

    2040-2049: 668k.

    2050+: 1.2M.

     

    Added Value

    Decarbonization Value

    $3M

    Incentives: 3M.

    Net Present Value

    $3.7M

    The central cooling plant at 215 East 68th Street is nearing the end of its useful life, prompting Rudin Management to consider the best plan for the buildings plant. The cheapest and simplest approach would be to replace existing low pressure steam absorbers in kind. Weighing the LL97 penalties starting in 2030, the building saw an opportunity to implement a new and electric heat recovery system to eliminate fines and decarbonize the building’s operations. While the electric heat recovery chillers carry a larger upfront cost, the cost of ownership over 30 years is lower than that of a fossil fuel system with a lower upfront cost but significant annual emissions penalties.

    An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

    Strategic Decarbonization Roadmap

    More Like This

    Case Study
    NYSERDA supported
    Case Study

    The Victory

    Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

    Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

    The Victory Case Study
    Case Study
    Case Study

    The Towers

    Oldest US multifamily co-op transforms wastewater into clean energy
    The Towers Case Study

    Case Study

    Melrose & Noll St. Apartments

    Thermal network to support decarbonization of affordable housing

    This case study was chosen as part of the Empire Building Challenge competition. Click here to learn more about the Empire Building Challenge competition.

    Noll Apartments, located at 43 Central Avenue, and Melrose Apartments, located at 63 Central Avenue, are neighboring buildings in Brooklyn, New York. The buildings are 6 stories and total 131,865 square feet with 98 affordable apartment units. The decarbonization retrofit planned for these buildings includes a package of measures that will:

    • Combine all mechanical equipment into a single central plant serving both buildings which will facilitate thermal energy recovery, allow for the integration of future decarbonized thermal energy sources, and reduce first- and ongoing maintenance costs. 
    • Electrify, and recover energy for, loads currently served by fossil fuels (heating and domestic hot water). 
    • Improve the energy efficiency of the buildings by reducing thermal loads through ventilation energy recovery and envelope improvements
    • Reduce construction costs by avoiding the staggering of measure implementation where possible.

    Creating resilient and sustainable communities are key components of RiseBoro’s mission. The principles of energy efficiency, improved health outcomes, reduced consumption, and responsible use of natural resources are core beliefs of the organization.

    Melrose & Noll Apartments
    Lessons Learned

    The project used the Resource Efficient Decarbonization (RED) methodology to consider various technical and financial options and determine the optimal decarbonization pathway.

    Lessons Learned

    The project utilizes existing technology in a creative new application to greatly reduce the initial costs of electrification.

    Emissions Reductions

    61%

    A displacement strategy approach was developed to maximize cost-efficacy of decarbonization without burdening affordable housing residents and operators, resulting in a 61% projected energy use reduction for the building by the end of the Empire Building Challenge project.

    A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

    Building System Conditions
    • Equipment nearing end-of-life
    • New heat source potential
    • Comfort improvements
    • Indoor air quality improvements
    • Facade maintenance
    • Efficiency improvements
    Asset Conditions
    • Capital event cycles
    • Owner sustainability goals
    Market Conditions
    • Technology improves
    • Market supply changes

    Noll Apartments and Melrose Apartment contain the original HVAC equipment from their construction in the early- and mid-2000s that is nearing the end of its useful life. This aging equipment, considered alongside a recent recapitalization event, presents an opportunity to focus on improving energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions. Additionally, these buildings are part of a tranche of buildings in the RiseBoro portfolio constructed prior to the adoption of more aggressive energy efficiency approaches. Implementation of the decarbonization retrofits will not only lower the buildings’ emissions, but will also bring energy performance up to, or higher than, other buildings in the portfolio. The Empire Building Challenge program provided a unique opportunity at a convenient time to create a holistic roadmap and retrofit plan.

    Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

    Existing Conditions

    This diagram illustrates the building prior to the initiation of Strategic Decarbonization planning by the owners and their teams.

    Click through the measures under “Building After” to understand the components of the building’s energy transition.

    Sequence of Measures

    2027

    Building System Affected

    • heating
    • cooling
    • ventilation
    Melrose & Noll Apartments before
    Melrose & Noll Apartments after
    Central Mechanical Plant
    Active Thermal Connector (ATC)
    Central AWHPs and HACs
    Terminal Unit Replacement
    Wastewater Heat Recovery Heat Pumps for DHW
    Envelope Upgrades
    Ventilation Upgrades
    Electrical Upgrades and Grid-Interactive Controls
    Solar PV on new roof canopy
    Future Thermal Energy Netwrok (TEN) Connection
    Additional Electrical Upgrades
    Cooking Ranges & Commercial Dryer Electrification

    Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

    Retrofit Costs

    Decarbonization Costs

    $19.4M

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Costs

    $755,000 + $74,000 / YR

    Energy cost savings: 74k / YR.

    Repairs and maintenance savings: Minimal

    BAU cost of system replacement/upgrades: 755k.

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Risks

    $0

    Added Value

    Decarbonization Value

    $7M

    Incentives: ~7M (estimated).

    Net Present Value

    -$11.5M

    The business case for decarbonization is centered around the buildings’ recapitalization cycles and a reduction in operating expenses.

    The buildings currently face no potential penalties under Local Law 97 (since they are affordable housing covered under Article 321) and the operational savings are not commensurate with the cost of the Roadmap.

    This is a typical situation in multifamily buildings, especially affordable housing, where the discounted cash flow analysis shows a negative present value compared to business as usual. High initial costs and the high cost per-unit of electricity compared to gas in New York City both push paybacks in an unattractive direction. A building will typically see only a handful of opportunities to fund capital projects. Incentives and tax credits are critical in making the business case for decarbonization.

    An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

    Strategic Decarbonization Roadmap

    More Like This

    Case Study
    NYSERDA supported
    Case Study

    The Victory

    Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

    Energy conservation analysis at midtown tower

    The Victory Case Study
    Case Study
    Case Study

    The Towers

    Oldest US multifamily co-op transforms wastewater into clean energy
    The Towers Case Study

    Case Study

    High Temperature Heat Pump 101 Guide

    A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

    Building System Conditions
    Asset Conditions
    Market Conditions

    Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

    Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

    Retrofit Costs

    Decarbonization Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Risks

    Added Value

    Decarbonization Value

    Net Present Value

    An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

    This guide from The Clean Fight and RMI helps building owners and managers understand how high-temperature heat pumps can decarbonize steam and hot-water space heating systems. It outlines key benefits, technology basics, example products, and strategies for effective retrofit integration. High-temperature heat pumps offer a new, less disruptive path to electrification for buildings with steam or hot water distribution.

    More Like This

    Sorry, no content found.

    Case Study

    Charrette Templates: Supporting Preliminary Retrofit Plan Review

    A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

    Building System Conditions
    Asset Conditions
    Market Conditions

    Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

    Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

    Retrofit Costs

    Decarbonization Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Risks

    Added Value

    Decarbonization Value

    Net Present Value

    An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

    Charrette Overview

    A charrette is a focused, collaborative convening of diverse stakeholders. In planning a building decarbonization project, charrettes are a powerful tool for establishing a holistic understanding of a building’s existing conditions and needs, aligning stakeholders, developing creative solutions, and accelerating the retrofit design process.

    Context

    While charrettes can be used within multiple contexts, this resource has been developed to support the review of a preliminary retrofit plan. The preliminary retrofit plan scope is developed based on existing building conditions, high-level energy data and calculations, as well as the team’s expertise and prior project experience. Having a charrette at this point in the process allows for early feedback about the retrofit scope and alignment with project goals. It provides an opportunity for collaborative problem-solving and the development of creative solutions, as multi-disciplinary stakeholders are brought together to iterate on the retrofit. More detailed energy and financial analysis will occur after the charrette and may drive scope change as the team uses results to optimize the retrofit.

    Templates Overview

    The following templates have been developed to reduce the effort required to include a charrette in retrofit planning and guide project teams through the charrette process. The format of the templates is intentionally basic so your organization(s)’ presentation format and logos can easily be added.

    The templates are intended to be used by the design team to gather feedback and develop consensus from project stakeholders on the following topics:

    • Project goals
    • Retrofit triggers
    • Proposed retrofit plan

    Three templates are available for download and are designed to work together. These include:

    Pre-Read Template: Use this template to develop a project-specific pre-read document that can help inform the charrette discussion. This template offers a preset agenda for the charrette and provides space to clearly define project goals, trigger events, and a high-level summary of the retrofit plan. To maximize benefit from the charrette it is important that attendees arrive with a solid understanding of the information provided in the pre-read. Therefore, it is recommended the document remain as concise as possible and is sent to attendees with sufficient time for them to review.

    Download the Pre-Read Template

    Charrette Presentation Template: This easily customizable slide deck template provides a framework and content to guide project teams through the charrette. The intended outcomes from the charrette are level setting stakeholders on the project’s status and plans, collecting feedback, and ideation.

    Download the Presentation Template

    Post-Charrette Report Template: Use this template to capture outputs from the charrette and distribute to project stakeholders. The report is intended to support the team in coming to consensus on goals, retrofit triggers, and the preliminary retrofit plan. Once finalized, it can be used as a basis for moving into the detailed analysis phase.

    Download the Post-Read Template

    More Like This

    Sorry, no content found.

    Case Study

    Strategic Decarbonization Planning Training Series

    A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

    Building System Conditions
    Asset Conditions
    Market Conditions

    Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

    Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

    Retrofit Costs

    Decarbonization Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Risks

    Added Value

    Decarbonization Value

    Net Present Value

    An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

    About the Series

    NYSERDA and Building Energy Exchange, in collaboration with RMI, University of Cincinnati, and Ember Strategies, are excited to offer a comprehensive three-part Strategic Decarbonization Planning training series designed to help industry professionals tackle complex retrofit projects with confidence. Tailored for professionals in engineering, real estate, and technology, this training series will equip participants with the tools and knowledge to drive practical, cost-effective low-carbon retrofits in large buildings. Grounded in lessons learned from NYSERDA’s Empire Building Challenge and their innovative retrofit demonstration projects, participants will learn how to:

    • Identify effective retrofit strategies by evaluating technical solutions and real estate conditions;
    • Make the case for low-carbon retrofits with compelling business narratives that resonate with decision-makers; and
    • Turn plans into action by creating clear, step-by-step decarbonization roadmaps for real-world projects.

    Live training sessions for all three courses are coming this spring. Read more about our high-impact, solutions driven training series below:

    Course 1

    SDP: RED Framework and Technical Solutions (1.5 AIA LU)

    This first course of the series will explore Resource Efficient Decarbonization (RED) as a replicable solutions framework used to develop carbon neutrality roadmaps for large buildings in cold climates. Using real-world examples from Empire Building Challenge retrofit projects, participants will learn how to apply the RED framework to create comprehensive, long-term decarbonization plans for their buildings. Additionally, the training will review a range of technical solutions for decarbonizing buildings, highlighting how prioritization of these technologies can optimize retrofits.

    Sign up for March 18

    Take Course 1 On-Demand

    Course 2

    SDP: Building the Business Case for Better Decarbonization (1.5 AIA LU)

    The second course will focus on the finance and asset planning components of strategic decarbonization. Participants will learn how to evaluate and align technical solutions with economic realities and long-term asset strategies to inform decision-making. This course will also provide guidance on crafting compelling business case narratives that build stakeholder support and unlock investment for retrofits. By the end of the training, participants will be equipped to develop persuasive business cases that advance building decarbonization projects.

    Sign up for March 18

    Take Course 2 On-Demand

    Course 3

    Let’s Decarbonize! A Hands-on Building Decarbonization Workshop

    The third course of the series will be a highly interactive session offering a hands-on introduction to building decarbonization planning – delivered in a dynamic, game-based format. The session begins with a brief review of key concepts from the first two courses, then, participants will break into small groups to create a mock decarbonization plan for a real-world building scenario. Teams will evaluate strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while weighing factors such as costs, trigger events, and other site- specific considerations. Come prepared to collaborate, apply your skills, and dive into the decision- making process behind effective building decarbonization.

    This material was developed at the University of Cincinnati by Amanda Webb, Barry Abramson, Katherine Castiello Jones, and Heather Cheng. It is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. 2339386.

    Sign up for March 19

    More Like This

    Sorry, no content found.

    Case Study

    High Rise | Low Carbon Multifamily

    A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

    Building System Conditions
    Asset Conditions
    Market Conditions

    Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

    Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

    Retrofit Costs

    Decarbonization Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Risks

    Added Value

    Decarbonization Value

    Net Present Value

    An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

    A global survey of 14 high-rise multifamily retrofit profiles that achieved deep energy reductions.

    More Like This

    Sorry, no content found.

    Case Study

    Retrofit Playbook Event Series: New Decarbonization Tools from ASHRAE, USGBC, and The Retrofit Playbook

    A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

    Building System Conditions
    Asset Conditions
    Market Conditions

    Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

    Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

    Retrofit Costs

    Decarbonization Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Risks

    Added Value

    Decarbonization Value

    Net Present Value

    An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

    As climate-forward policies have gained momentum and high-performance building technologies have continued to advance, building owners are feeling increasing pressure to decarbonize while navigating a growing array of retrofit options and requirements. How can project teams chart a course through this evolving and overwhelming landscape to confidently plan and implement decarbonization retrofits?

    The newly released Guide to Strategic Decarbonization Planning, produced by ASHRAE, U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), and supported by New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), presents a comprehensive suite of best practices to operationalize deep decarbonization in buildings by following the strategic decarbonization planning (SDP) framework. SDP is a proven approach to decarbonization planning that integrates holistic technical solutions with pragmatic asset management strategies, enabling project teams to deliver cost-effective, flexible decarbonization projects.

    Join ASHRAE, USGBC, and the Retrofit Playbook for Large Buildings team on September 23rd to learn more about the Guide to Strategic Decarbonization Planning and explore how it connects with the tools, case studies, and planning resources available on the RetrofitPlaybook.org. Whether you’re just getting started or refining a long-term roadmap, this session will help you learn how to apply the SDP framework and other practical resources to actualize low-carbon, future-ready building retrofits.

    Opening Remarks

    Sophie Cardona, Senior Project Manager, NYSERDA

    Moderator

    Molly Dee-Ramasamy, Director of Deep Carbon Reduction Group, JBB

    Presenters

    Laurie Kerr, Principal Climate Advisor, USGBC
    Phil Keuhn, Principal, RMI

    Panelists

    Adam Hinge, Managing Director, Sustainable Energy Partnerships
    Laurie Kerr, Principal Climate Advisor, USGBC
    Phil Keuhn, Principal, RMI
    Laura Humphrey, Senior Director of Energy & Sustainability, L+M Development Partners

    More Like This

    Sorry, no content found.

    Case Study

    Strategic Decarbonization Assessment (SDA) Tool

    A baseline assessment is key to understanding current systems and performance, then identifying conditions, requirements or events that will trigger a decarbonization effort. The assessment looks across technical systems, asset strategy and sectoral factors.

    Building System Conditions
    Asset Conditions
    Market Conditions

    Effective engineering integrates measures for reducing energy load, recovering wasted heat, and moving towards partial or full electrification. This increases operational efficiencies, optimizes energy peaks, and avoids oversized heating systems, thus alleviating space constraints and minimizing the cost of retrofits to decarbonize the building over time.

    Making a business case for strategic decarbonization requires thinking beyond a traditional energy audit approach or simple payback analysis. It assesses business-as-usual costs and risks against the costs and added value of phased decarbonization investments in the long-term.

    Retrofit Costs

    Decarbonization Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Costs

    Avoided Risks

    Business-as-Usual Risks

    Added Value

    Decarbonization Value

    Net Present Value

    An emissions decarbonization roadmap helps building owners visualize their future emissions reductions by outlining the CO2 reductions from selected energy conservation measures. This roadmap is designed with a phased approach, considering a 20- or 30-year timeline, and incorporates the evolving benefits of grid decarbonization, ensuring a comprehensive view of long-term environmental impact.

    Insights from the Empire Building Challenge

    The Strategic Decarbonization Assessment calculator is a valuable tool that allows building owners and retrofit teams to align their asset decarbonization strategies with their capital investment strategies. The SDA is designed to integrate assessment of multiple requirements including optimizing net present value, replacing equipment close to end of life, avoiding compliance fees, and coordinating electrification of fossil fuel equipment with future electric grid decarbonization. 

    The SDA is a long-term financial planning tool for building owners to manage carbon emissions and energy use. During the Empire Building Challenge program, the tool guided participants in refining their decarbonization scenarios and identifying the most cost-effective decarbonization plans. Several teams were able to show positive net present value for their decarbonization plans compared to business as usual. This process can benefit many buildings and property owners in New York in better quantifying, representing, and identifying optimal decarbonization scenarios.

    The SDA tool was built by Arup and Ember Strategies. It was previously developed for the San Francisco Department of the Environment and modified for NYSERDA use in the Empire Building Challenge.

    Download SDA Overview

    User Advisory

    The SDA tool was created as the one-stop shop for the development and modeling of the business case that supports initiating a decarbonization roadmap. The SDA tool below was developed based on ASHRAE Standard 211 normative forms with a variety of users and use cases across the United States in mind. 

    The tables and charts on the “Summary (Print Me)” tab outline assumptions, costs, savings, decarbonization trajectory and alignment with NYC’s LL97 requirements. The bar charts and trajectories on this tab should be a graphical representation of the narrative explanation of your plan and business case from the “Narrative & Measures” and “Alternatives” tabs. The “Carbon emissions per year, before offsets” and the “Relative NPV of Alternatives” charts on the “Summary (Print Me)” tab should illustrate the sequencing and timing of equipment replacement, relationships between ECMs and savings/costs.

    SDA Inputs Table

    The table below describes inputs of the SDA tool and directions associated with each.

    On the “Building info and assumptions” tab, users input basic information about the building: floor areas, space types, fuel types and consumption (bill) data. The “Building info and assumptions” tab enables users to communicate building information in a highly customized way at a very granular level. Default values do not need to be changed unless the business case is materially impacted by these estimates (i.e.  maintenance costs are reducing in addition to energy costs). Most of these assumptions are found in the “Real Estate Characteristics” drop down menu. Use the drop-down menu to change the default escalations rates for general costs and specific fuel costs over time. Sensitivity analyses that explore a variety of future rate scenarios are encouraged to show that you have considered the sensitivity/fragility/resilience of your plan in a variety of futures. 

    The “Regulatory Assumptions” drop down on this tab includes NYSERDA default values for fuel specific emissions factors stipulated by LL97. This section also automatically calculates the building’s LL97 emissions limits for the 2024-2029 and 2030-2034 time periods using building typology and GSF inputs on the same tab. Please note: As of 2024, the SDA tool has not been updated to reflect any recent changes to LL97 building classes and missions factors.

    On the “Equipment Inventory” tab, users will input major energy using equipment. All the fossil fuel equipment and at least 80% of total energy using equipment should be inventoried and reported on this tab. Very similar or identical equipment can be grouped into one row (e.g. multiple AHUs of generally the same size and age). The date of installation is required as it determines the equipment life and is used to define the Business As Usual (BAU) trajectory – existing equipment is projected to continue functioning until it reaches End of Useful Life and is replaced, like for like, at that time. User-input costs for the like for like replacement are also required inputs to complete the BAU trajectory. Please note, the estimated replacement cost and year installed are required inputs for the SDA graphics. Replacement costs for decarbonization measures and BAU equipment replacement need not be overly precise – these cost numbers should be realistic to ensure ROI and NPV calculations are sufficient for comparative purposes.

    NPV and savings calculations in the SDA are significantly influenced by major energy using equipment. To streamline SDA development and simplify analysis, project teams should focus on major equipment and group minor equipment together by age, if feasible. If you are not using the landlord/tenant cost/benefit breakout, keep all equipment in column I (Tenants Own/Operate) marked “No”. This tab also enables a simple summer/winter peak/off peak calculator for demand ECMs, but using this feature is optional and is not a replacement for a full 8760 hour model. 

    The “Percent energy/carbon by equipment RUL” graphics to the right (cell AY) should populate as expected if everything is input correctly. This visual is often used in business case narratives, but does not appear on the Summary tab.

    On the “Narrative & Measures” tab, users narratively define their alternatives and input all the ECMs (costs and energy/carbon impacts) that will be assigned to years on the “Alternatives” tab. The SDA automatically generates two BAU cases: one in which LL97 compliance is not sought and fines are applied, and one in which LL97 compliance is achieved through carbon offsets alone.

    Note the measure life column is a critical input as it determines how long the measure’s savings will persist – if the measure ends without replacement, the corresponding uptick in energy/carbon on that year will show in the trajectory graphs. 

    Some potential users may be generating detailed energy models and bringing the outputs from those models into the SDA. These users may streamline ECMs to minimize data entry and rely on the narrative explanation of the measures. The simplest ECM list in this case may be “Year 1 ECMs”, “Year 2 ECMs”, etc. with corresponding costs and benefits; but be advised that users must explain their measures very clearly where they have aggregated costs and benefits.

    On the “Alternatives” tab, users schedule ECMs and review the bar charts and trajectories between those Alternatives. The charts on this tab should illustrate the business case consistent with the narrative section. As stated before, the landlord vs. tenant breakdown for ECMs is not required (column H of Alternatives) and the subsequent charts can be disregarded if not used. Note the Holding period and Analysis periods can be varied independently, but most EBC users keep both set for 20 years.

    The “Total Relative NPV Compared to Baseline – Varying Time Horizons” chart (cell AZ) is very commonly used in internal business cases to evaluate cost-effectiveness of the Alternatives over different time horizons, but it is not included on the Summary tab.

    Most of the calculations happen on the “Operating Statements” tab, where an annual operating statement is created for each alternative/baseline for the 20-year analysis period. Users can review these statements as needed; however, it is not recommended to edit this portion of the tool directly. This is typically done when troubleshooting a trajectory chart that does not match user expectations.

    Download

    The SDA tool is available for download below, including a blank version as well as a version with data from a sample building.

    Blank SDA Sample Building SDA

    Instructional Videos

    Four instructional videos detailing each step of the SDA process are linked below:

    Part 1: Introduction & Inputs

    Part 2: Equipment Inventory

    Part 3: Narrative & Measures

    Part 4: Scenarios & Results

    More Like This

    Sorry, no content found.